Tag Archive for reading response
Pachisi response
by Maria •
Response
by Skye •
I love the readings for this week because each article was so different and unique. And it is not because of how different their topics were, these articles describe games or a game and explain how it is important to that country. Additionally, how play expresses the changes of societies, history, and human nature. The “Playing…
Reading Response II
by chandsaker •
Caillois work Man, Play, and Games, while an improvement from Huzinga’s work Homos Ludens, seems to me like a hypocritical circle of game categorization. Caillois spends the entire first half of the book attempting to place games into four distinct categories –the Latin titles of which drive me crazy– only to go right back around…
Caillois Response
by Alan Kloosterhof •
While Huizinga provided a useful starting definition of play, I think that his work might have suffered a bit from his insistence on keeping everything in one amorphous category of “play.” Caillois, on the other hand, benefits from his attempt to establish a taxonomy that accounts for a variety of different forms of play and…
Caillois RR
by cgill •
In Man, Play, and Games, by Roger Caillois, there were lots of things that were thought provoking. An interesting point came in the Corruption of Games chapter. “It may be of interest to ask what becomes of games when the sharp line dividing their ideal rules from the diffuse and insidious laws of daily life…
Caillois Reading Response
by Maria •
This weeks reading on Caillois was a bit mind numbing I must admit. The book/research was interesting itself but I could not understand Caillois’ obsession with categories. Everything he wrote about games was fit into a category, then a sub category, and after that categories were mixed and matched, or debunked as being able to…
Response
by Skye •
Caillois’s book is a conflicting book, in my opinion.. I find the book fascinating from an academic point.. Caillois shows how games are important to both society and humanity, which is fascinating to see the reasons for why. Like when he delves into the sociological and the mathematical. However, I just disliked how he makes…
Week 3 Caillois reading response
by Keenan T •
Caillois’ work Man Play and Games was refreshing after reading Huizinga’s work since this is probably the first discourse in the community of the study of games and play. Since I disagreed so much with Huizinga’s thoughts I thought I, and I really wanted to, would like Caillois’ book but every time he made a…