Tag Archive for reading response

Pachisi response

The Pachisi article from The Art of Contest was not the most robust article from our readings this week but it was the one that intrigued me the most. I have never played Pachisi and have only heard of it in passing before so it was interesting to read about the history and some of the…

Response

I love the readings for this week because each article was so different and unique. And it is not because of how different their topics were, these articles describe games or a game and explain how it is important to that country. Additionally, how play expresses the changes of societies, history, and human nature. The “Playing…

Reading Response II

Caillois work Man, Play, and Games, while an improvement from Huzinga’s work Homos Ludens, seems to me like a hypocritical circle of game categorization. Caillois spends the entire first half of the book attempting to place games into four distinct categories –the Latin titles of which drive me crazy– only to go right back around…

Caillois Response

While Huizinga provided a useful starting definition of play, I think that his work might have suffered a bit from his insistence on keeping everything in one amorphous category of “play.” Caillois, on the other hand, benefits from his attempt to establish a taxonomy that accounts for a variety of different forms of play and…

Caillois RR

In Man, Play, and Games, by Roger Caillois, there were lots of things that were thought provoking. An interesting point came in the Corruption of Games chapter. “It may be of interest to ask what becomes of games when the sharp line dividing their ideal rules from the diffuse and insidious laws of daily life…

Caillois Reading Response

This weeks reading on Caillois was a bit mind numbing I must admit. The book/research was interesting itself but I could not understand Caillois’ obsession with categories. Everything he wrote about games was fit into a category, then a sub category, and after that categories were mixed and matched, or debunked as being able to…

Response

Caillois’s book is a conflicting book, in my opinion.. I find the book fascinating from an academic point.. Caillois shows how games are important to both society and humanity, which is fascinating to see the reasons for why. Like when he delves into the sociological and the mathematical. However, I just disliked how he makes…

Week 3 Caillois reading response

Caillois’ work Man Play and Games was refreshing after reading Huizinga’s work since this is probably the first discourse in the community of the study of games and play. Since I disagreed so much with Huizinga’s thoughts I thought I, and I really wanted to, would like Caillois’ book but every time he made a…

Broad to the Point of Meaningless

Roger Caillois’ book Man, Play and Games is, in many ways, a direct critique of Huizinga’s Homo Ludens. It attempts to build on the ideas of Huizinga’s work and both critique them as well as to build off of them. Overall the primary theme in in Man, Play and Games is that Homo Ludens, while…